Methane
quashes green credentials of hydropower
Jim Giles
Abstract
Emissions from tropical dams can exceed
fossil-fuel plants.
At
the time, it must have sounded like a sensible case of sustainable
development. During the 1980s, about 2,500 square kilometres of
Amazonian rainforest was flooded to create the Balbina dam to
feed the energy demands of the Brazilian city of Manaus. A sizeable
chunk of rainforest was lost, but Brazil gained access to a non-polluting
energy source. It's a compromise Brazil has made many times; more
than 80% of the country's domestic electricity is generated by
hydropower plants.
R.
ANTONIO/GAMMA
The
greenhouse-gas emissions from regions flooded by dams may have
been grossly underestimated.
Yet
the clean, green image of dams may have been seriously overstated.
Researchers are gathering in Paris next week to discuss greenhouse-gas
emissions from tropical reservoirs. Some of the latest findings
point to a disturbing conclusion: that the global-warming impact
of hydropower plants can often outweigh that of comparable fossil-fuel
power stations. If that's correct, current energy strategies,
particularly in developing nations, will need to be rethought.
The
problem lies with the organic matter in the reservoir. Large amounts
are trapped when land is flooded to create the dam, and more is
flushed in after that. In the warm water of tropical dams, this
matter decays to form methane and carbon dioxide. Although both
are greenhouse gases, the main worry is methane, which has more
than 20 times the warming impact of carbon dioxide over a 100-year
period. In the specific case of Balbina, there is now a rough
consensus: in terms of avoiding greenhouse-gas emissions, a fossil-fuel
plant would have been better.
But
that is where the agreement ends. On one side of the debate is
Philip Fearnside, a conservation biologist at the National Institute
for Research in the Amazon in Manaus. His work, based mainly on
theoretical calculations, looks at water leaving dams. Many dams
release water from several metres below the surface, so the flow
goes through an abrupt pressure change. Fearnside calculates that
this causes methane release, much as carbon dioxide fizzes out
when carbonated drinks are opened. His latest results suggest
that a typical tropical hydropower plant will, during the first
ten years of its life, emit four times as much carbon as a comparable
fossil-fuel station.
Lining
up against him in a decade-long dispute are Luiz Pinguelli Rosa
and his colleagues at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro,
who accuse Fearnside of exaggerating reservoir emissions. They
complain in particular that Fearnside has extrapolated from measurements
taken on the Petit Saut dam in French Guiana; the data were taken
in the years immediately after the reservoir was created, when
the store of organic matter would have been greatest.
With
few data sets available on tropical dams, the debate has increased
in acrimony without approaching a conclusion. Environmental groups
question the impartiality of Rosa's work, which is funded in part
by the hydropower industry. Rosa strongly denies any bias, and
in turn accuses Fearnside of seeking to show that "something
is wrong with dams".
If
these estimates are correct, figures for annual global methane
emissions need to be increased by a fifth.
The
Paris meeting, which runs on 5–6 December and is organized by
the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO), is unlikely to settle their dispute, but researchers
will discuss new methane data. On 14 November, for example, Frédéric
Guérin of the Laboratory of Meteorology in Toulouse, France,
and his colleagues published results on methane release from sites
downstream of three tropical dams1. They found that so much methane
builds up in the dam that downstream emissions, which are rarely
factored into estimates of a reservoir's impact, should account
for between a tenth and a third of total emissions. Another new
paper estimates that, for Balbina, downstream emissions alone
have the same greenhouse warming potential as 6% of all the fossil
fuels consumed by São Paulo, a city of more than 11 million
people2.
Even
without these downstream emissions, the global impact of dams
may be significant. Danny Cullenward, an energy-policy expert
at Stanford University, has made preliminary calculations of the
impact of Fearnside's findings. Cullenward stresses that more
data are needed, but his estimates suggest that dams release between
95 million and 122 million tonnes of methane per year. If correct,
estimates of annual global methane emissions (which do not generally
include dam emissions) need to be increased by a fifth. Even extrapolating
Rosa's figures gives Cullenward a total of 23 million tonnes.
Many
think enough is known to start acting now. Some worry about the
huge dam projects tentatively planned for tropical areas, such
as a $5-billion project on the Congo river. Another concern is
the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), a system that allows developed
nations to fund clean-energy projects in developing nations in
return for credits that can be used to meet Kyoto Protocol targets.
Current rules allow certain hydropower projects to be funded under
the CDM, a situation some scientists and environmental groups
would like to see revised.
But
matters are unlikely to change without more data, so researchers
at the UNESCO meeting will discuss which questions to prioritize
and how best to work together. More substantial progress could
begin in 2008, when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) will decide whether or not to start work on a special report
on renewable energy. Previous IPCC special reports have had significant
political impact, and the dams question is likely to fit very
well into the scope of the proposed energy study, says Bert Metz,
a climate-policy expert at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment
Agency and co-chair of one of the IPCC's three working groups.
References
Guérin, F. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L21407 (2006).
Kemenes, A., Forsberg, B. R. & Melack, J. M. in Proc. 8th
Int. Conf. Southern Hemisphere Meteorology and Oceanography, Foz
do Iguaçu, Brazil, 24–28 April 2006, 663–668 (INPE, São
José dos Campos, Brazil, 2006).